Trafford Design Code


Compliance Report


Joynson Street housing

Address:

Joynson Street
Sale M33 7FF
Map It

Application status:

Outline application

Application Number:

TRAF/16496/OUT



Landscape and Nature



LNL1: Trees: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code


LNL2: Boundaries and Edges: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code


LNL3 Protecting Existing Landscape: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: there was no landscape on site, and applicant provided sufficient evidence for this


LNL4: Drainage and SUDs: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: drainage was dealt off-site


LNL5: Biodiversity: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code


LNL6: Gardens and Small Spaces: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: not applicable because theres no gardens




Streets and Public Realm



Street Design


SPSD1: Active travel and street hierarchy The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



SPSD2: Safe streets and attractive public realm: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



SPSD3: Futureproofing: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPSD4: Street trees, SUDS and landscaping: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: no street trees provided. we asked applicant to provide and he said now



SPSD5: On-street parking: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: parking is dealt with underground instead




Public Realm


SPPR1: Safety and Security: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: its not considered safe and we belive this is reason for refusal



SPPR2: Hostile vehicle mitigation: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



SPPR3: Wayfinding and legibility: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: no wayfinding. site was too small



SPPR4: Street furniture: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



SPPR4: Street furniture: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



SPPR6: Desire lines: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: no desire lines



SPPR7: Materials: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



SPPR8: Accessibility: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR9: Play and Recreation: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Residential sites



Landscape led residential layouts


RSRL1:Landscape led: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



RSRL2: Context and identity: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: sddasd



RSRL3: Sustainable urban drainage solutions: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



RSRL4: Active travel and street hierarchy: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



RSRL5: Urban greening factor: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: asdfsad



RSRL6: Landscape coding requirements: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: afsdfafe



RSRL7: Development block layout: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: eface



RSRL8: Vehicle parking: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: ce




Visual Structure


RSVS1: Coherent rhythm and structure of streets: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: fdfsf



RSVS2: Variation: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



RSVS3: Define and enclose spaces with buildings: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



RSVS4: Views, vistas and landmarks: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: fsdfsdf




Houses



Type, Form and Profile


HTFP1: Relevance to context: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: efasdf



HTFP2: Building line: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



HTFP3: Roof types informed by local context: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



HTFP4: Depth and articulation of facades: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: fasdfa



HTFP5: Porch and entrance articulation: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code




Plan and Layout


HPL1: National space standards: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: dsadas



HPL2: Internal living environment: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: cea



HPL3: Dual aspect dwellings: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



HPL4: Provision of living spaces: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



HPL5: Floor to ceiling height: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: ceara



HPL6: External living environment: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



HPL7: Landscape strategy: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: ceafra



HPL8: Separation distances: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: cearafvce



HPL9: Rear garden separation distances: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: ce



HPL10: Bin storage: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:


Permeable paving options