Trafford Design Code


Compliance Report


Leisure and retail scheme

Address:

market street
altrincham WA14 1QU
Map It

Application status:

Full application

Application Number:

8748347/FUL



Landscape and Nature



LNL1: Trees: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: no trees were proposed and we asked loads and reason for refusal


LNL2: Boundaries and Edges: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code


LNL3 Protecting Existing Landscape: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: there was no existing landscape and was proven


LNL4: Drainage and SUDs: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code


LNL5: Biodiversity: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code


LNL6: Gardens and Small Spaces: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Streets and Public Realm



Street Design


SPSD1: Active travel and street hierarchy The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



SPSD2: Safe streets and attractive public realm: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPSD3: Futureproofing: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPSD4: Street trees, SUDS and landscaping: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



SPSD5: On-street parking: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Public Realm


SPPR1: Safety and Security: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR2: Hostile vehicle mitigation: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR3: Wayfinding and legibility: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR4: Street furniture: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR4: Street furniture: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR6: Desire lines: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR7: Materials: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR8: Accessibility: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR9: Play and Recreation: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Residential sites



Landscape led residential layouts


RSRL1:Landscape led: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



RSRL2: Context and identity: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSRL3: Sustainable urban drainage solutions: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSRL4: Active travel and street hierarchy: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



RSRL5: Urban greening factor: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



RSRL6: Landscape coding requirements: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSRL7: Development block layout: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSRL8: Vehicle parking: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Visual Structure


RSVS1: Coherent rhythm and structure of streets: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



RSVS2: Variation: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



RSVS3: Define and enclose spaces with buildings: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSVS4: Views, vistas and landmarks: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Houses



Type, Form and Profile


HTFP1: Relevance to context: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



HTFP2: Building line: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HTFP3: Roof types informed by local context: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



HTFP4: Depth and articulation of facades: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HTFP5: Porch and entrance articulation: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Plan and Layout


HPL1: National space standards: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL2: Internal living environment: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL3: Dual aspect dwellings: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL4: Provision of living spaces: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL5: Floor to ceiling height: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL6: External living environment: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL7: Landscape strategy: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL8: Separation distances: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL9: Rear garden separation distances: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL10: Bin storage: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:


Permeable paving options