Compliance Report

---

Landscape and Nature

---

LNL1: Trees: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

LNL2: Boundaries and Edges: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

LNL3 Protecting Existing Landscape: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: There is no existing landscape on site

LNL4: Drainage and SUDs: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

LNL5: Biodiversity: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

LNL6: Gardens and Small Spaces: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: Garden sizes are below regulation size and do not contain enough landscape along boundaries. The applicant has refused to increase garden size and we believe reason for refusal

---

Streets and Public Realm

---

Street Design

SPSD1: Active travel and street hierarchy The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

SPSD2: Safe streets and attractive public realm: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

SPSD3: Futureproofing: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: no evidence of future adaptablity

SPSD4: Street trees, SUDS and landscaping: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

SPSD5: On-street parking: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: no on-street parking provided and applicant says not enough space available which is not accurate

---

Public Realm

SPPR1: Safety and Security: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

SPPR2: Hostile vehicle mitigation: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: not applicable and no need for HVM

SPPR3: Wayfinding and legibility: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

SPPR4: Street furniture: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

SPPR4: Street furniture: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

SPPR6: Desire lines: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

SPPR7: Materials: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

SPPR8: Accessibility: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: the scheme has change of levels which would not be appropriate for wheelchair users

SPPR9: Play and Recreation: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

---

Residential sites

---

Landscape led residential layouts

RSRL1:Landscape led: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

RSRL2: Context and identity: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

RSRL3: Sustainable urban drainage solutions: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

RSRL4: Active travel and street hierarchy: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

RSRL5: Urban greening factor: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

RSRL6: Landscape coding requirements: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

RSRL7: Development block layout: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

RSRL8: Vehicle parking: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

---

Visual Structure

RSVS1: Coherent rhythm and structure of streets: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

RSVS2: Variation: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: There is too much variation along streets and no visual structure

RSVS3: Define and enclose spaces with buildings: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

RSVS4: Views, vistas and landmarks: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

---

Houses

---

Type, Form and Profile

HTFP1: Relevance to context: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: Building typs not appropriate for local context

HTFP2: Building line: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

HTFP3: Roof types informed by local context: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

HTFP4: Depth and articulation of facades: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

HTFP5: Porch and entrance articulation: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: porch design is poor and an after thought

---

Plan and Layout

HPL1: National space standards: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: not applicable

HPL2: Internal living environment: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:

HPL3: Dual aspect dwellings: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: not enough

HPL4: Provision of living spaces: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: not applicable as no houses above 3 bedroom

HPL5: Floor to ceiling height: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: Ceiling heights too low and applicant refuse to

HPL6: External living environment: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:

HPL7: Landscape strategy: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:

HPL8: Separation distances: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:

HPL9: Rear garden separation distances: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:

HPL10: Bin storage: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: