Compliance Report


Argyle Street Apartments and Health Centre

Address:

24 Argyle Street
Stretford M
Map It

Application status:

Full application

Application Number:

TRAF/14320/FUL



Landscape and Nature



LNL1: Trees: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: There are no new trees proposed in the project and some retained mature landscape that has complied with the relevant design code. We feel this is valid justification for not providing new trees


LNL2: Boundaries and Edges: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code


LNL3 Protecting Existing Landscape: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code


LNL4: Drainage and SUDs: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification: The scheme does not adequately deal with the issue of drainage. The drainage consultants report (ref no. 2803289/FUL) confirms that there will not be sufficient drainage across the site and we feel this is a reason for refusal


LNL5: Biodiversity: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code


LNL6: Gardens and Small Spaces: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Streets and Public Realm



Street Design


SPSD1: Active travel and street hierarchy: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPSD2: Safe streets and attractive public realm: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



SPSD3: Futureproofing: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code



SPSD4: Street trees, SUDS and landscaping: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPSD5: On-street parking: The proposed scheme complies with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code




Public Realm


SPPR1: Safety and Security: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR2: Hostile vehicle mitigation: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR3: Wayfinding and legibility: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR4: Street furniture: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR4: Street furniture: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR6: Desire lines: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR7: Materials: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR8: Accessibility: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



SPPR9: Play and Recreation: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Residential sites



Landscape led residential layouts


RSRL1:Landscape led: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSRL2: Context and identity: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSRL3: Sustainable urban drainage solutions: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSRL4: Active travel and street hierarchy: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSRL5: Urban greening factor: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSRL6: Landscape coding requirements: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSRL7: Development block layout: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSRL8: Vehicle parking: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Visual Structure


RSVS1: Coherent rhythm and structure of streets: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSVS2: Variation: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSVS3: Define and enclose spaces with buildings: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



RSVS4: Views, vistas and landmarks: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Houses



Type, Form and Profile


HTFP1: Relevance to context: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HTFP2: Building line: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HTFP3: Roof types informed by local context: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HTFP4: Depth and articulation of facades: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HTFP5: Porch and entrance articulation: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:




Plan and Layout


HPL1: National space standards: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL2: Internal living environment: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL3: Dual aspect dwellings: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL4: Provision of living spaces: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL5: Floor to ceiling height: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL6: External living environment: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL7: Landscape strategy: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL8: Separation distances: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL9: Rear garden separation distances: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:



HPL10: Bin storage: The proposed scheme does not comply with the best practice guidance set out in Design Code

Explanation or Justification:


Permeable paving options