COMPLIANCE REPORT


The design code element has been adequately addressed

The design code element has not been adequately addressed in the design and the applicant is able to justify the reasoning for this or demonstrate how an alternative response would create a more positive outcome

The design code element is mandatory but has not been adequately addressed in the design which may lead to the application being refused


22 Northdown Road, Urmston



Form and Profile


How does the form and profile of house reflect the surrounding context

The roof reflects houses in the surrounding area

The type, form and scale does not match houses in the surrounding area. Applicant must provide justification and evidence there is not a common or positive precedent of housing form and profile in the surrounding area.

The house does not follow a building line. The applicant must demonstrate there is no common building line in existing area. If there is a building line which has not been followed, the applicant must demonstrate how setting forward or back from this will result in a more positive visual outcome to the street scene


Does the house create an interesting form and profile

The entrance is clearly articulated and expressed as integral part of design

The form of house does not creates depth and articulation. The applicant must demonstrate how an alternative response will create a more positive visual appearance for the house and explain if there are any examples in the context for why this approach was taken


Does the internal layout create a pleasant living condition

Layout protects privacy of inhabitants and neighbours

All room sizes comply with National Described Space Standards

Layout does not optimise daylight and sunlight entering house The applicant must provide reason why a layout that could not optimise natural light was not achieveable

Layout does not maximise cross ventilation between openable windows. The applicant must demonstrate why cross ventilation was not possible or desirable and explain how an alternative response was chosen

Noise transmission between habitable rooms has not been mitigated. The applicant must explain why the layout could not mitigate against noise transmittance between habitable rooms and demonstrate the alternative response

Two living spaces have not been provided, or do not have external windows. The applicant must demonstrate why two living spaces could not be achieved and what an alternative response to living spaces has been provided

Floor to ceiling height are not over 2.5m for at 75% of the gross internal area. Not reaching floor to ceiling height standards may lead to a refusal of application unless can be justified how and why standard could not be achieved.

Permeable paving options